Why does the Virtual Console have better ...

The games in XBL arcade are a joke.  You have games from the 2600, that unless they come with 30 to 50 other games are a rip off.  I mean you can get collections for your XBOX for the same price.  It's a slap in the face from Microsoft and I cannot believe people are contributing.  I have paid for one arcade game and that was castlevania.  It is the best game so far which doesn't say much.  I'am excited about P of P but I hope Microsoft would start treating their customers with a little respect or they will not be customers fro very long.Why does the Virtual Console have better ...
Because Nintendo is actually putting top quality games on their VC, with a decent price tag, and sees it as an extension of the Wii's catalogue. Whereas MS seems to put most crap to mediocre ancient games with ''enhanced'' graphics that are pretty simplistic and boring. They're the sort of port jobs some modder could do in his spare time, all so MS can nickel and dime the consumer. I don't think MS cares too much about its XBLArcade marketplace. Recently they were asking people on the internet what they wanted to see come out for the 360, I'll be surprised if even a few of them come out within a year. Why does the Virtual Console have better ...
Nintendo's past library is just tops.  brands like Mario and Zelda have been around a while... and their line of games are next to none.MS on the other hand has to rely more on original titles... and unlike past games like Mario and Zelda (where those games were made by the top gaming developers at that time), these new arcade games are made by new inexperienced dev teams most of the time.
because... duuuuh..